Comments on: Why I am a ‘cultural non-Christian’ https://freethinker.co.uk/2024/09/why-i-am-a-cultural-non-christian/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-i-am-a-cultural-non-christian The magazine of freethought, open enquiry and irreverence Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:27:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: William Franke https://freethinker.co.uk/2024/09/why-i-am-a-cultural-non-christian/#comment-320 Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:27:34 +0000 https://freethinker.co.uk/?p=14484#comment-320 In reply to Christopher Kelly.

Kelly is absolutely right. Botz-Bornstein should read Tom Holland’s book (‘Dominion: How the Christian Revolution Remade the World’) to take on this issue in cultural-historical terms. In the terms of Botz-Bornstein’s book, I think this article shows that he does not like Christianity (or Islam) and that he does like secularism. His book (‘How Much Religion is Good for Us?’) lucidly and provocatively suggests that anyone’s adhering to a religion (or cultural ideology) is fundamentally a matter of liking it. The article could hardly be more clear and definite about the personal question it wants not to answer nor even to allow to be raised.

]]>
By: Christopher Kelly https://freethinker.co.uk/2024/09/why-i-am-a-cultural-non-christian/#comment-319 Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:50:05 +0000 https://freethinker.co.uk/?p=14484#comment-319 I appreciate the point you’re making, but “secularism, the Enlightenment, the freedom to speak up against religion” didn’t emerge ex-nihilo in the Western world. It arose (paradoxically) out of Christian concepts and assumptions developed over centuries. As Tom Holland put it, whether we recognise it or not, “we’re goldfish swimming in Christian waters”.

]]>